May 4, 2000
Toronto Globe and Mail
When junk science turns lethal
by Margaret Wente
Dr. Mark Wainberg is taking a certain amount of flak these days for taking on the HIV deniers. The renowned Montreal researcher is president of the International Aids Society, and he thinks these people are deeply irresponsible. He wouldn't mind seeing a few of them silenced. "These people are doing harm," he told me. "Perhaps there might once have been good ground to dispute the linkage between HIV and AIDS. It's indisputable now."
In North America, the HIV dissidents are a hardy group consisting of two or three scientists (whom no one funds), a small band of wishful thinkers, and a Canadian medical journalist named Nicholas Regush. Mr. Regush has a new book, The Virus Within, which claims that another virus, not HIV, is the probable cause of AIDS. He believes that treatment with AZT is useless, even toxic, and he encourages HIV victims to throw away their medicine. He also claims that the entire scientific establishment, which he brands "the New Gestapo," ruthlessly suppresses opposing views like his.
Dr. Wainberg and other crusaders against the terrible AIDS scourge haven't wasted much breath on the dissidents until now. They've trusted in science, not rebuttal, to win the day. But now, the stakes are dramatically higher than ever before. The stakes are the lives of millions, and the fate of nations, because the dissidents have found a believer where it matters most.
The foremost critic of AIDS science in the world today is South Africa's president, Thabo Mbeki. Mr. Mbeki has asserted his government's right to resist "the superimposition of Western experience on African reality." He has personally consulted the American scientists who think the HIV link is a myth and the epidemic is overstated. He has stopped distributing AZT to pregnant women because he thinks it's toxic. The army has stopped using it, too.
The president's supporters include influential African journalists as well as the right-wing Boerestaat Party, which recently applauded his efforts to "investigate the biggest hoax of the century."
Meantime, AIDS is poised to devastate South Africa, which has one of the highest infection rates in the world. More than 10 per cent of the population is infected with HIV, and 3.5 million of them will probably die in the next decade. They will include a disproportionate number of nurses, engineers, and other well-educated, highly productive people.
Throughout subsaharan Africa, 23 million people are now infected. Not far behind: Southeast Asia, India, China, Latin America, the Caribbean. Those who compare AIDS to the Holocaust, in its scope and human devastation, are correct.
Now let's return to Mr. Regush, a former medical reporter with the Montreal Gazette who portrays himself as a crusading investigative journalist. In fact, he has often made a living as a medical conspiracy theorist, yet reputable book publishers, national television broadcasters and leading newspapers have been quite happy to give him a platform.
What is the quality of Mr. Regush's journalism? Well, in 1996, the CBC's the fifth estate ran a full-hour program he both proposed and produced. It was a medical exposÈ called, The Heart of the Matter. It insinuated that a certain heart medication was not only unsafe, but was killing thousands of patients, and that two Canadian doctors were hushing up the truth about this killer drug because they had ties to big drug companies.
Both doctors took the CBC and Mr. Regush to court for libel, and both won. Last fall, Dr. Martin Myers was awarded $200,000. Two weeks ago, Dr. Frans Leenen was awarded $950,000 -- the highest damage award in Canadian media history. The judge in the Leenen case slammed Mr. Regush for his "slanted and reprehensible story line," docked him personally for $200,000 in aggravated and punitive damages, and wrote: "Parasitic sensationalists should not be allowed to prey upon society's obsession with scandal and to reap personal benefit from their irresponsible actions."
Mr. Regush's career, however, is still flourishing, thanks to credulous news directors and publishers who don't know much about science but think controversy sells. He currently plies his anti-AZT theories on the website at ABC News, where he is also billed as a medical reporter.
Mark Wainberg calls Mr. Regush's theories a cruel scientific hoax. "More seriously," he says, "his book may also endanger public health if it is taken seriously by its readers."
Speech should still be free, no matter how foolish or odious. But not every subject has two sides worth airing. We no longer consider seriously the views of those who claim cigarettes are harmless, or the opinions of Ernst Zundel. And though there are many, many unanswered questions about AIDS, the link to HIV and the benefit of AZT are really not in doubt. Those who deny those facts are contributing to the death of thousands, maybe millions. They don't deserve a hearing. They deserve contempt.
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 11:13:30 EST
Subject: your website
I've been going through my check list of organizations (including yours) that
published a defamatory column about me by Margaret Wente of the Toronto Globe
and Mail. Since publication of the column, under threat of a lawsuit the
Globe has issued an apology to me. At this point, I'm asking politely that
you include the apology with the publication of that column.
I'll check in two weeks to see whether you have done so.
>>> So it should be duly noted that the Toronto Globe and Mail has apologized to Nicholas Regush under threat of lawsuit.
A popular magazine gives AIDS denialism a dangerous footing
Letter to the Community by ACT UP/Golden Gate
Answering the AIDS Denialists: CD4 (T-Cell) Counts, and Viral Load
_AIDS TREATMENT NEWS_Issue #341 April 21, 2000
use back button on browser to return